Name: Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (en Inglés)
Price: 48523.00 ARS
Availability: InStock
Author: Jacques Ranciere
ISBN: 9780816628452

portada Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Univ Of Minnesota Pr

Autor

Jacques Ranciere

Año

2004

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

168

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Peso

ISBN

0816628459

ISBN13

9780816628452

N° edición

Categorías

Filosofía social y política

Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (en Inglés)

Jacques Ranciere (Autor) · Univ Of Minnesota Pr · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 48.523

$ 80.871

Ahorras: $ 32.348

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 28 de Mayo y el Jueves 06 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Argentina entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (en Inglés)"

“Is there any such thing as political philosophy?” So begins this provocative book by one of the foremost figures in Continental thought. Here, Jacques Rancière brings a new and highly useful set of terms to the vexed debate about political effectiveness and “the end of politics.”What precisely is at stake in the relationship between “philosophy” and the adjective “political”? In Disagreement, Rancière explores the apparent contradiction between these terms and reveals the uneasy meaning of their union in the phrase “political philosophy”—a juncture related to age-old attempts in philosophy to answer Plato’s devaluing of politics as a “democratic egalitarian” process.According to Rancière, the phrase also expresses the paradox of politics itself: the absence of a proper foundation. Politics, he argues, begins when the “demos” (the “excessive” or unrepresented part of society) seeks to disrupt the order of domination and distribution of goods “naturalized” by police and legal institutions. In addition, the notion of “equality” operates as a game of contestation that constantly substitutes litigation for political action and community. This game, Rancière maintains, operates by a primary logic of “misunderstanding.” In turn, political philosophy has always tried to substitute the “politics of truth” for the politics of appearances.Disagreement investigates the various transformations of this regime of “truth” and their effects on practical politics. Rancière then distinguishes what we mean by “democracy” from the practices of a consensual system in order to unravel the ramifications of the fashionable phrase “the end of politics.” His conclusions will be of interest to readers concerned with political questions from the broadest to the most specific and local.